Mill Test Certificates (MTC) have emerged as essential documents that verify material properties and confirm compliance with relevant standards. MTCs are indispensable across various industries, including steel, aerospace, automotive, oil & gas, and construction. However, managing these certificates manually has become increasingly cumbersome due to growing regulatory demands, supply chain complexities, and the push for digital transformation. This blog explores the common challenges associated with MTC management across different sectors and how automation offers a viable solution.
Common Challenges Across Industries
While the need for MTCs is universal, the challenges of managing these documents vary by industry. However, some common issues cut across sectors:
Industry-Specific Challenges and Solutions
While the above challenges are common, each industry faces its unique hurdles in MTC management. Let's explore how automation can address these challenges across various sectors:
Solutions and Best Practices for Effective MTC Automation
To effectively implement MTC automation, companies must adopt a strategic approach that addresses both technological and operational aspects:
Automating Mill Test Certificates offers a myriad of benefits, from reducing manual errors and enhancing compliance to improving operational efficiency. However, the path to successful MTC automation varies across industries, each with its unique challenges and requirements. By adopting a tailored approach that considers industry-specific needs and leveraging advanced technologies like AI and machine learning, companies can navigate the complexities of MTC management and reap the rewards of digital transformation.
A Certificate of Analysis (COA) Report/ Material Test Report (MTR)/Mill Test Certificate (MTC) is a quality assurance document provided by the manufacturer that certifies the chemical and mechanical properties of a material, often related to metal products. It serves as a comprehensive record, detailing the production conditions, testing methods, and compliance with industry standards.
Various COAs/MTRs are employed across diverse industries, each serving distinct purposes. The following are some prevalent types:
Deciphering a COA report may pose a challenge, especially for those not frequently engaged with such documents. Complicating matters, COA formats lack a standardized structure, and the documents are commonly translated from other languages, adding an extra layer of complexity. However, amidst these challenges, when navigating a Certificate of Analysis/Mill Test Report, it's reassuring to know that the verification of the material's physical and chemical composition remains a consistent aspect, irrespective of the document's origin.
The initial examination of an MTR commences with a physical assessment of the material either on the shop floor or within the warehouse. Verification involves confirming the presence and clear identification of the heat number on the material's surface. A comparison between this number and the corresponding MTR is conducted to ensure alignment. Basic surface and edge measurements are then performed to affirm that the material adheres to project specifications based on physical dimensions and thickness.
Moving to subsequent inspection steps, individuals need to consult the relevant ASME/ASTM/EN standards section corresponding to their project's material requirements. Here, the chemical composition table is located, and a comparison is made between the percentage values presented in the MTR and the acceptable range specified in the table. Common elements include Carbon (C), Chromium (Cr), Copper (Cu), Manganese (Mn), Molybdenum (Mo), Nitrogen (N), Nickel (Ni), Phosphor (P), Sulphur (S), and Silicon (Si).
Following the examination of the chemical analysis, attention is directed to the mechanical property table associated with the same specification. A parallel process is undertaken, comparing the measured values in the MTR with the acceptable range outlined in the mechanical properties section. Essential mechanical properties for assessment encompass tensile strength, hardness, charpy impact test results, and yield strength.
Once these three components undergo a satisfactory review, the MTR can be archived, digitized, and linked to the material, signifying its clearance for progression to the subsequent stage in the production process.
To overcome these challenges, QA/Engineering departments can consider implementing automation solutions. Automated systems can:
MTRs are indispensable for ensuring the quality and integrity of materials in various industries. As technology advances, embracing automation can significantly enhance the efficiency of QA/Engineering departments, making the process of managing and documenting MTRs more seamless and less time-consuming. By adopting automated solutions, organizations can not only improve data accuracy but also stay ahead in an increasingly competitive and regulated environment.